The latest version is...
The latest version is a true zero-emissions vehicle, thanks to the advanced E-Flex propulsion system. It does without the original"s 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbocharged engine. Instead, power is provided by two sources: an advanced hydrogen fuel cell, carried on board, and a lithium-ion battery.
Throwing litter out...
Throwing litter out of your car window is a shameful and anti-social habit. But itò€™s clearly addictive. More than 1.3 million bits of rubbish are dropped on Britainò€™s motorways every weekend. Thatò€™s over 67 million items a year, according to the Highways Agency.
The game could soon be up for litter louts, though. Tough new rules are about to make it much easier to fine drivers. Soon London councils will only have to catch the offending carò€™s registration number on CCTV camera and the owner will be forced to cough up a hefty penalty ò€“ even if theyò€™re not the actual person who threw the rubbish! But what about the rest of the UK? To see just how bad Britainò€™s litter crisis really is, Auto Express decided to experience the clean-up operation first hand.
We joined a rubbish collection crew from Colchester Borough Council, Essex, for a morning on the verges. And we were shocked by what we found.
We were destined for whatò€™s known locally as the Avenue of Remembrance ò€“ the main road out of town towards the A12, and the most popular route for those heading south of the area.
We deliberately targeted this road because, with no footpath on the southbound side, it was highly unlikely pedestrians would use it. This was confirmed on the day ò€“ we didnò€™t see a soul walking ò€“ and it meant we could virtually guarantee every piece of litter was there courtesy of drivers.
We met up with the councilò€™s HotSpot team, Sharon Fulwood and Andrew Pitchford, who respond to calls from the public about where thereò€™s excessive litter. Armed with a mechanical grabber and a roll of bin bags, we set to work ò€“ and what a back-breaking job it was!
In a half-mile stretch of road and on only one side of the carriageway, we filled four bags in 90 minutes. The most shocking thing is that this section of road is cleared every two weeks ò€“ and on each occasion the same amount of rubbish is collected.
ò€œItò€™s disgusting what people do and what they throw away,ò€ Sharon complained. ò€œIn the past weò€™ve found dirty nappies, bottles of urine and needles which we presume have been used for drugs.ò€
During our session, we uncovered every type of rubbish imaginable. Fast food containers, cups, milk cartons, carrier bags and sweet wrappers were all common sights. We even found a wheel trim. ò€œThis is the kind of thing we usually pick up,ò€ Sharon explained. ò€œBut we will come back in a fortnight and do exactly the same again. The worst bit of the job is when you get people winding down their car or van windows and just deliberately throwing stuff on the ground right in front of you as they pass.ò€
Andrew had gone up the road in the other direction, and returned to the van we were using as a base with another four bags ò€“ and some news. ò€œIò€™ve found a dead animal in a bag, a folding metal chair anda bit of bumper trim. Weò€™re going to have to take the van to pick up those,ò€ he said.
Every year, it costs more than Ò£500million to pick up litter from the streets of England. And thatò€™s just the roads ò€“ not parks or public spaces. At the start of August, the Highways Agency launched a campaign to raise awareness of the problem. Called Bag it and Bin it!, the nationwide initiative saw thousands of special paper bags distributed at motorway service stations.
But while such campaigns are a step in the right direction, enforcement is more likely to change driver habits ò€“ and thatò€™s very much on the agenda.
The controversial new weapon in the fight against the litterbugs forms part of the London Local Authorities Act 2007 ò€“ and itò€™s set to make it much simpler for a vehicleò€™s registered keeper to be prosecuted for littering in the capital, even if they werenò€™t the actual offender.
All council bosses will need is a car registration number, obtained from staff eyewitness accounts or CCTV. Officers will then contact the DVLA to obtain the name and address of the vehicleò€™s registered keeper. The car owner can either pass on the details of the guilty party or pay the fine themselves.
Local authorities can already follow this course of action, but a legal loophole currently means that if the driver challenges the accusation, wonò€™t supply the information or simply refuses to comply, the case can collapse.
A councilò€™s best bet for a successful prosecution is CCTV images that show the offenderò€™s face. But when the litter is likely to have been thrown from a moving vehicle, thatò€™s almost impossible ò€“ which is why the rules will change later this year.
For now, the Act only targets drivers in London ò€“ but one influential group is desperate for the rules to be applied all over the country. The Local Government Authority (LGA) is the umbrella body for UK councils, and its members complain they donò€™t have the jurisdiction to take action against littering motorists.
They can issue a fine to a driver by using the DVLA database (see our panel on Page 63). But they lack the power to enforce it through a court and pin the crime on the registered keeper if they say they werenò€™t behind the wheel at the time.
Paul Bettison, chairman of the LGAò€™s Environment Board, told us: ò€œCouncils are already coming under increasing pressure to deal with littering, and some of the legislation is confusing. Registered keepers can be prosecuted for speeding, unless details of an alternative offender are given. So why not for littering?ò€
Not everyone is happy with the plans. Phil Booth is national co-ordinator of NO2ID, a pressure group that campaigns against ò€˜the database stateò€™. He told us: ò€œLittering is an offence and itò€™s horrible that people mess up the environment. But the DVLA database ò€“ which isnò€™t accurate ò€“ wasnò€™t designed for this.
ò€œFor the number of people itò€™s going to catch itò€™s disproportionate. This is a case of councils issuing bullying fines to motorists who may be totally innocent.ò€